A Case Study of Response to the Polycrisis

By: Glenn G. Page, Sam Buckton, Mark Cabaj, Ian Goldman, Kate McKegg, Mutizwa Mukute, Michael Quinn Patton, and Hailey Rizzo

Abstract

The Transformations 2023 conference panel discussed evaluation's role in transformative change, highlighting the need for innovative practices and collaborations to address global crises. The focus was on developing new methods and partnerships to enable equitable and sustainable systemic transformations.

Introduction

The Transformations 2023 conference brought together a panel of experts to discuss the evolving field of evaluation and assessment in the context of global polycrisis. This session, led by Glenn G. Page and other notable figures, delved into how transformative change is being evaluated and assessed, highlighting the need for new approaches in the face of complex social-ecological systems.

The Panel's Insights

The panelists, each with a rich background in evaluation, shared their perspectives on the necessity of transforming evaluation practices to better address the multifaceted challenges of our time. They emphasized the importance of developmental feedback, understanding impacts, and adapting to changing conditions. The discussion also touched on the need for more autonomous evaluation practices, embracing diverse perspectives, and understanding the values held by evaluands.

Key Themes in Evaluation for Transformation

1. Power Dynamics and Systemic Thinking: The panelists underscored the need to address power dynamics and adopt systemic thinking. This involves understanding the interconnectedness of various systems and the importance of shifting power to address systemic inequities.

2. Criteria for Evaluation: A significant focus was on redefining the criteria for evaluation to fit the context of transformation. This includes considering the ethical stance, non-independence of evaluators, and the importance of reflexivity.

3. Engagement and Agency: The panelists highlighted the importance of engaging stakeholders in the evaluation process and fostering a sense of agency among those involved in transformative management.

4. Shifts in Thinking: There was a consensus on the need to move away from conventional thinking and focus on what is likely to work in the future, considering unexpected outcomes and the larger context.

Evaluating Transformation: Challenges and Opportunities

The panelists discussed the challenges of evaluating transformation, including the emotional toll on practitioners and the overwhelming nature of the task. They stressed the importance of acknowledging these challenges while also focusing on the opportunities that transformative evaluation presents.

Conclusion

The State of the Practice Panel concluded that evaluation itself needs to undergo a transformation to remain relevant in evaluating societal changes. This requires evaluators to bring their full selves into their work, embracing their values and the complexities of the systems they are evaluating. The panel's insights offer a roadmap for how the field of evaluation can adapt and evolve to meet the demands of our rapidly changing world.